Referencias | Ciencia Social Abierta

Abdill, R. J., & Blekhman, R. (2019). Tracking the Popularity and Outcomes of All bioRxiv Preprints. bioRxiv, 515643. https://doi.org/10.1101/515643

Abierto, U. (2019). Las 5 Rutas Para Llegar al Acceso Abierto: Verde, Dorada, Bronce, Híbrida y Diamante. En Blog de la biblioteca de Traducción y Documentación de la Universidad de Salamanca.

Abril Ruiz, A. (2019). Manzanas podridas: Malas prácticas de investigación y ciencia descuidada.

Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., Chambers, C. D., Fisher, A., Gelman, A., Gernsbacher, M. A., Ioannidis, J. P., Johnson, E., Jonas, K., Kousta, S., Lilienfeld, S. O., Lindsay, D. S., Morey, C. C., Munafò, M., Newell, B. R., … Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). A Consensus-Based Transparency Checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, (ANID). (2020). Consulta Pública: Política Acceso Abierto a Información Científica.

Agnoli, F., Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L. S., Albiero, P., & Cubelli, R. (2017). Questionable Research Practices among Italian Research Psychologists. PLOS ONE, 12(3), e0172792. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172792

Alperin, J. P., Babini, D., & Fischman, G. (2014). Indicadores de acceso abierto y comunicaciones académicas en América Latina (Juan Pablo Alperin, Vol. 1). Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales, CLACSO.

ANID. (2020). Con Amplio Consenso ANID Inicia Hoja de Ruta de Política de Acceso Abierto.

ANID. (2020). Propuesta de Política de Acceso Abierto a La Información Científica y Adatos de Investigaciónfinanciados Con Fondos Públicos de La ANID. ANID.

Babini, D. (2014). Universidades y acceso abierto: hora de tomar protagonismo. Foro Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 1-3.

Bakker, B. N., Jaidka, K., Dörr, T., Fasching, N., & Lelkes, Y. (2020). Questionable and Open Research Practices: Attitudes and Perceptions among Quantitative Communication Researchers. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7uyn5

Banzato, G. (2019). Soberanía del conocimiento para superar inequidades: políticas de Acceso Abierto para revistas científicas en América Latina. Mecila Working Paper Series, 18, 1-18.

Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for Reproducible Research. arXiv:1802.03311 [cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03311

Becerril García, A., & Aguado López, E. (2019). The End of a Centralized Open Access Project and the Beginning of a Community-Based Sustainable Infrastructure for Latin America. OpenEdition Press, 41-55. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.oep. 9003.

Beigel, F. (2018). Las relaciones de poder en la ciencia mundial. Nueva Sociedad, 274, 13-28.

Beigel, F. (2021). América Latina podría convertirse en líder mundial de la ciencia abierta no comercial [Scientific Blog]. En The Conversation.

Bethesda. (2003). Declaración de Bethesda Sobre Publicación de Acceso Abierto.

Bishop, D. (2019). Rein in the Four Horsemen of Irreproducibility. Nature, 568(7753), 435-435. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01307-2

Bishop, L., & Kuula-Luumi, A. (2017). Revisiting Qualitative Data Reuse: A Decade On. SAGE Open, 7(1), 215824401668513. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016685136

Björk, B.-C. (2017). Gold, Green and Black Open Access. Learned Publishing, 30(2), 173-175. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1096

Blanca, J. (2019). Informática para las ciencias de la vida: Unix y Python [Course]. En Bioinformatics at COMAV.

Bohannon, J. (2016). Who’s Downloading Pirated Papers? Everyone. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 352(6285), 508-512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.352.6285.508

Breznau, N. (2021). Does Sociology Need Open Science? Societies, 11(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11010009

Breznau, N. (2019). The Future of Sociology Depends on Open Science [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/d37be

Breznau, N., Rinke, E. M., Wuttke, A., Adem, M., Adriaans, J., Alvarez-Benjumea, A., Andersen, H. K., Auer, D., Azevedo, F., Bahnsen, O., Balzer, D., Bauer, G., Bauer, P. C., Baumann, M., Baute, S., Benoit, V., Bernauer, J., Berning, C., Berthold, A., … Nguyen, H. H. V. (2021). Observing Many Researchers Using the Same Data and Hypothesis Reveals a Hidden Universe of Uncertainty. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/cd5j9

Brodeur, A., Lé, M., Sangnier, M., & Zylberberg, Y. (2016). Star Wars: The Empirics Strike Back. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20150044

Bueno, G. (2017). What Is Open Science? Introduction.

Burlig, F. (2018). Improving Transparency in Observational Social Science Research: A Pre-Analysis Plan Approach. Economics Letters, 168, 56-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.03.036

Byington, E., & Felps, W. (2017). Solutions to the Credibility Crisis in Management Science. Academy of Management Learning and Education, The, 16, 142-162. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0035

Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T.-H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Nave, G., Nosek, B. A., Pfeiffer, T., Altmejd, A., Buttrick, N., Chan, T., Chen, Y., Forsell, E., Gampa, A., Heikensten, E., Hummer, L., Imai, T., … Wu, H. (2018). Evaluating the Replicability of Social Science Experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 637-644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z

Card, D., DellaVigna, S., & Malmendier, U. (2011). The Role of Theory in Field Experiments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(3), 39-62. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.25.3.39

Carey, B. (2011). Fraud Case Seen as a Red Flag for Psychology Research. The New York Times.

CCSDS. (2012). Recommendation for Space Data System Practices MAGENTA BOOK REFERENCE MODEL FOR AN OPEN ARCHIVAL INFORMATION SYSTEM (OAIS).

Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered Reports: A New Publishing Initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016

Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered Reports: Realigning Incentives in Scientific Publishing. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 66, A1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022

Chin, J. M., Pickett, J. T., Vazire, S., & Holcombe, A. O. (2021). Questionable Research Practices and Open Science in Quantitative Criminology. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-021-09525-6

Christensen, G., & Miguel, E. (2018). Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research. Journal of Economic Literature, 56(3), 920-980. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171350

Christensen, G. S., Freese, J., & Miguel, E. (2019). Transparent and Reproducible Social Science Research: How to Do Open Science. University of California Press.

Collins, C. (2015). Social Science Data & Controlled Vocabulary (LIS6711) - LibraryGirlMiami.

Corti, L. (2019). Managing and Sharing Research Data: A Guide to Good Practice. (2nd edition). SAGE Publications.

Creative Commons, C. (2019). About CC Licenses [FAQ]. En What we do.

DDC. (2017). Using RISE, the Research Infrastructure Self Evaluation Framework | DCC.

Doucouliagos, C., & Stanley, T. D. (2013). Are All Economic Facts Greatly Exaggerated? Theory Competition and Selectivity. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(2), 316-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00706.x

Dublin-Core. (2020). Dublin Core Metadata Initiative.

Earth, D. on, & Behavioral, C. B. on. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. undefined.

EC. (2016). FAIR Data Management in Horizon 2020.

Editors, T. P. M. (2014). Observational Studies: Getting Clear about Transparency. PLOS Medicine, 11(8), e1001711. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001711

Elliott, K. C. (2020). A Taxonomy of Transparency in Science. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2020.21

FAIR, G. (2020). FAIR Principles.

Fanelli, D. (2009). How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data. PLOS ONE, 4(5), e5738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738

Ferguson, L. (2014). How and Why Researchers Share Data (and Why They Don’t).

Fernández, J. C. (2009). Derechos de Autor. En Derechos de Autor en plataformas e-learning.

Fernández, J. C., Graziosi, E., & Martínez, D. (2018). Derechos de Autor y Ciencia Abierta: El Papel de La Biblioteca Universitaria. VIII Conferencia Biredial-ISTEC.

Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable Research Practices Revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150

Fortney, K., & Gonder, J. (2015). A Social Networking Site Is Not an Open Access Repository. En Office of Scholary Communication University of California.

Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication Bias in the Social Sciences: Unlocking the File Drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502-1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484

Fraser, H., Parker, T., Nakagawa, S., Barnett, A., & Fidler, F. (2018). Questionable Research Practices in Ecology and Evolution. PLOS ONE, 13(7), e0200303. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200303

Freese, J., & Peterson, D. (2017). Replication in Social Science. Annual Review of Sociology, 43(1), 147-165. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053450

Gall, T., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Maniadis, Z. (2017). The Credibility Crisis in Research: Can Economics Tools Help? PLOS Biology, 15(4), e2001846. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001846

Gerber, A., & Malhotra, N. (2008). Do Statistical Reporting Standards Affect What Is Published? Publication Bias in Two Leading Political Science Journals. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 3(3), 313-326. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00008024

Gerber, A. S., & Malhotra, N. (2008). Publication Bias in Empirical Sociological Research: Do Arbitrary Significance Levels Distort Published Results? Sociological Methods & Research, 37(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108318973

Gilbert, D. T., King, G., Pettigrew, S., & Wilson, T. D. (2016). Comment on "Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science". Science, 351(6277), 1037-1037. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad7243

Gómez, N. D., Méndez Rodríguez, E. M., & Hernández Pérez, A. (2016). Datos y Metadatos de Investigación En Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades: Una Aproximación Desde Los Repositorios Temáticos de Datos.

Hernández, D. (2014). Manual de Datos Científicos Abiertos La Ciencia La Hacemos Entre Todos.

Hernández, E. (2016). Por Qué Open Access? 28(1).

ICSU. (2014). Open Access to Scientific Data and Literature and the Assessment of Research by Metrics.

Initiative, B. O. A. (12 de Septiembre, 2012). Diez años desde la Budapest Open Access Initiative: hacia lo abierto por defecto. En BOAI.

John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524-532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953

Kapiszewski, D., & Karcher, S. (2019). Transparency in Practice in Qualitative Research [Preprint]. Politics and International Relations. https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2019-if2he-v2

Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results Are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196-217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4

Kryvokhyzha, D. (2019). The Best Free Research Data Repository. Bioinformatics & Genomics Scientist.

LAPOP. (2020). Inicio. LAPOP (Espanol).

Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven Steps toward Transparency and Replicability in Psychological Science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 61(4), 310-317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222

Loredo, A. (2012). Derecho Comparado: Derecho de Autor y Copyright. Dos Caminos Que Se Encuentran. En Portal de gobierno electrónico, inclusión digital y sociedad del conocimiento.

Makel, M. C., Hodges, J., Cook, B. G., & Plucker, J. A. (2021). Both Questionable and Open Research Practices Are Prevalent in Education Research. Educational Researcher, 0013189X211001356. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211001356

Mardones, R., Ulloa, J., & Salas, G. (2018). Usos del diseño metodológico cualitativo en artículos de acceso abierto de alto impacto en ciencias sociales. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19, n, 1-18.

Marsden, E., Morgan-Short, K., Trofimovich, P., & Ellis, N. C. (2018). Introducing Registered Reports at Language Learning: Promoting Transparency, Replication, and a Synthetic Ethic in the Language Sciences. Language Learning, 68(2), 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12284

Melero, R., & Abad, M. F. (2008). Revistas Open Access: Características, Modelos Económicos y Tendencias. 20.

Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A.-M. (2019). Preregistration of Analyses of Preexisting Data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338-352. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.493

Merton, R. K. (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theorerical and Empirical Investigations. The University of Chicago Press.

Miguel, E., Camerer, C., Casey, K., Cohen, J., Esterling, K. M., Gerber, A., Glennerster, R., Green, D. P., Humphreys, M., Imbens, G., Laitin, D., Madon, T., Nelson, L., Nosek, B. A., Petersen, M., Sedlmayr, R., Simmons, J. P., Simonsohn, U., & Laan, M. V. der. (2014). Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research. Science, 343(6166), 30-31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245317

Monti, C., & Unzurrunzaga, C. (2020). Acceso a la literatura científica desde Sci-Hub: Análisis y reflexión de las descargas en Argentina. Revista Hipertextos, 8 (14), 111-116. https://doi.org/10.24215/23143924e022

Moore, D. A. (2016). Preregister If You Want To. The American Psychologist, 71(3), 238-239. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040195

Motyl, M., Demos, A. P., Carsel, T. S., Hanson, B. E., Melton, Z. J., Mueller, A. B., Prims, J. P., Sun, J., Washburn, A. N., Wong, K. M., Yantis, C., & Skitka, L. J. (2017). The State of Social and Personality Science: Rotten to the Core, Not so Bad, Getting Better, or Getting Worse? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 34-58. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000084

Muñoz, P. (2010). ESTADO DEL ARTE NACIONAL E INTERNACIONAL EN MATERIA DE GESTION DE DATOS DE INVESTIGACION E INFORMACION CIENTIFICA Y TECNOLOGICA Y RECOMENDACIONES DE BUENAS PRACTICAS.

Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., Buck, S., Chambers, C. D., Chin, G., Christensen, G., Contestabile, M., Dafoe, A., Eich, E., Freese, J., Glennerster, R., Goroff, D., Green, D. P., Hesse, B., Humphreys, M., … Yarkoni, T. (2015). Promoting an Open Research Culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422-1425. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374

Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The Preregistration Revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600-2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114

Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered Reports: A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results. Social Psychology, 45(3), 137-141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192

O’Boyle, E. H., Banks, G. C., & Gonzalez-Mulé, E. (2017). The Chrysalis Effect: How Ugly Initial Results Metamorphosize Into Beautiful Articles. Journal of Management, 43(2), 376-399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527133

OCDE. (2020). Open Science - OECD.

Omatos, A. (2013). Aspectos Legales En La Educación.

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716-aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226-1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847

Piwowar, H. A., & Vision, T. J. (2013). Data Reuse and the Open Data Citation Advantage. PeerJ, 1, e175. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.175

Piwowar, H., Priem, J., & Orr, R. (2019). The Future of OA: A Large-Scale Analysis Projecting Open Access Publication and Readership. BioRxiv, 795310.

Programa de Información Científica, M. de D. (2019). La Ciencia La Hacemos Entre Todos.

Rabelo, A. L. A., Farias, J. E. M., Sarmet, M. M., Joaquim, T. C. R., Hoersting, R. C., Victorino, L., Modesto, J. G. N., & Pilati, R. (2020). Questionable Research Practices among Brazilian Psychological Researchers: Results from a Replication Study and an International Comparison. International Journal of Psychology, 55(4), 674-683. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12632

Ramírez, P., & Samoilovich, D. (2019). Ciencia Abierta. Reporte Para Tomadores de Decisiones.

Rosenthal, R. (1979). The File Drawer Problem and Tolerance for Null Results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638-641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638

Sadaba, I. (2014). EL ACCESO ABIERTO EN CIENCIAS SOCIALES: NOTAS SOCIOLÓGICAS SOBRE PUBLICACIONES, COMUNIDADES Y CAMPOS. 17, 93-113.

Schindler, D., Zapilko, B., & Krüger, F. (2021). Investigating Software Usage in the Social Sciences: A Knowledge Graph Approach. arXiv:2003.10715 [cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.10715

Sharan, M. (2020). Ten Arguments Against Open Science That You Can Win | Software Sustainability Institute.

Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359-1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632

Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-Curve: A Key to the File-Drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534-547. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033242

Socha, B. (2018). Cuánto cobran los principales editores comerciales por tener un artículo en acceso abierto? En Universo Abierto.

Spinak, E. (2019). Revistas que han aumentado el valor del APC han recibido más artículos. En Scielo en Perspectiva.

Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering Integrity in Research: Definitions, Current Knowledge, and Future Directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022268

Stewart, S., Rinke, E. M., McGarrigle, R., Lynott, D., Lunny, C., Lautarescu, A., Galizzi, M. M., Farran, E. K., & Crook, Z. (2020). Pre-Registration and Registered Reports: A Primer from UKRN. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/8v2n7

Swan, A. (2013). Directrices Para Políticasde Desarrollo y Promoción Del Acceso Abierto. UNESCO.

Taylor, M. (2020). An Altmetric Attention Advantage for Open Access Books in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Scientometrics, 125, 2523-2543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03735-8

Tierney, N. J., & Ram, K. (2020). A Realistic Guide to Making Data Available Alongside Code to Improve Reproducibility. arXiv:2002.11626 [cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.11626

Ulloa, J., & Mardones, R. (2017). Tendencias Paradigmáticas y Técnicas Conversacionales En Investigación Cualitativa En Ciencias Sociales. Perspectivas de la Comunicación, 10, n, 213-235.

UNESCO. (2020). Qué Es Ciencia Abierta? UNESCO Lanza Consulta Global.

Universitarias, B. (2020). Make Your Data Discoverable | University of Oklahoma Libraries.

Velterop, J. (2018). De suscripciones y Tasas de Procesamiento de Artículos [Scientific Blog]. En Scielo en Perspectiva.

Viscusi, W. K. (2014). The Role of Publication Selection Bias in Estimates of the Value of a Statistical Life (Working Paper N.º 20116; Working Paper Series). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w20116

Vivalt, E. (2015). Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Impact Evaluation. American Economic Review, 105(5), 467-470. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151015

Whyte, A., & Pryor, G. (2011). Open Science in Practice: Researcher Perspectives and Participation. International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(1), 199-213. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v6i1.182

Wilkinson, M., & Dumontier, M. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship. 3(160018). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 454-463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412

WIPO. (2020). Frequently Asked Questions: IP Policies for Universities and Research Institutions [Science Organization]. En World Intelectual Property Organization.

World Intelectual Propiety Organization, W. (2020). What Is Intellectual Property? (WIPO).