Capítulo 3 Referencias

Abril Ruiz, Angel. 2019. Manzanas podridas: Malas prácticas de investigación y ciencia descuidada.
Aczel, Balazs, Barnabas Szaszi, Alexandra Sarafoglou, Zoltan Kekecs, Šimon Kucharský, Daniel Benjamin, Christopher D. Chambers, et al. 2020. «A Consensus-Based Transparency Checklist». Nature Human Behaviour 4 (1): 4-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6.
Agnoli, Franca, Jelte M. Wicherts, Coosje L. S. Veldkamp, Paolo Albiero, y Roberto Cubelli. 2017. «Questionable Research Practices among Italian Research Psychologists». PLOS ONE 12 (3): e0172792. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172792.
Bakker, Bert N., Kokil Jaidka, Timothy Dörr, Neil Fasching, y Yphtach Lelkes. 2020. «Questionable and Open Research Practices: Attitudes and Perceptions among Quantitative Communication Researchers». PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7uyn5.
Breznau, Nate, Eike Mark Rinke, Alexander Wuttke, Muna Adem, Jule Adriaans, Amalia Alvarez-Benjumea, Henrik Kenneth Andersen, et al. 2021. «Observing Many Researchers Using the Same Data and Hypothesis Reveals a Hidden Universe of Uncertainty». MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/cd5j9.
Brodeur, Abel, Mathias Lé, Marc Sangnier, y Yanos Zylberberg. 2016. «Star Wars: The Empirics Strike Back». American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 8 (1): 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20150044.
Burlig, Fiona. 2018. «Improving Transparency in Observational Social Science Research: A Pre-Analysis Plan Approach». Economics Letters 168 (julio): 56-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.03.036.
Byington, Eliza, y Will Felps. 2017. «Solutions to the Credibility Crisis in Management Science». Academy of Management Learning and Education, The 16 (marzo): 142-62. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0035.
Camerer, Colin F., Anna Dreber, Felix Holzmeister, Teck-Hua Ho, Jürgen Huber, Magnus Johannesson, Michael Kirchler, et al. 2018. «Evaluating the Replicability of Social Science Experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015». Nature Human Behaviour 2 (9): 637-44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z.
Card, David, Stefano DellaVigna, y Ulrike Malmendier. 2011. «The Role of Theory in Field Experiments». Journal of Economic Perspectives 25 (3): 39-62. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.25.3.39.
Carey, Benedict. 2011. «Fraud Case Seen as a Red Flag for Psychology Research». The New York Times, noviembre.
Chambers, Christopher D. 2013. «Registered Reports: A New Publishing Initiative at Cortex». Cortex 49 (3): 609-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016.
Chambers, Christopher D., Zoltan Dienes, Robert D. McIntosh, Pia Rotshtein, y Klaus Willmes. 2015. «Registered Reports: Realigning Incentives in Scientific Publishing». Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior 66: A1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022.
Chin, Jason M., Justin T. Pickett, Simine Vazire, y Alex O. Holcombe. 2021. «Questionable Research Practices and Open Science in Quantitative Criminology». Journal of Quantitative Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-021-09525-6.
Christensen, Garret S., Jeremy Freese, y Edward Miguel. 2019. Transparent and Reproducible Social Science Research: How to Do Open Science. Oakland, California: University of California Press.
Christensen, Garret, y Edward Miguel. 2018. «Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research». Journal of Economic Literature 56 (3): 920-80. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171350.
Doucouliagos, Chris, y T. D. Stanley. 2013. «Are All Economic Facts Greatly Exaggerated? Theory Competition and Selectivity». Journal of Economic Surveys 27 (2): 316-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00706.x.
Editors, The PLOS Medicine. 2014. «Observational Studies: Getting Clear about Transparency». PLOS Medicine 11 (8): e1001711. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001711.
Elliott, Kevin C. 2020. «A Taxonomy of Transparency in Science». Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2020.21.
Fanelli, Daniele. 2009. «How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data». PLOS ONE 4 (5): e5738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
Fiedler, Klaus, y Norbert Schwarz. 2016. «Questionable Research Practices Revisited». Social Psychological and Personality Science 7 (1): 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150.
Franco, A., N. Malhotra, y G. Simonovits. 2014. «Publication Bias in the Social Sciences: Unlocking the File Drawer». Science 345 (6203): 1502-5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484.
Fraser, Hannah, Tim Parker, Shinichi Nakagawa, Ashley Barnett, y Fiona Fidler. 2018. «Questionable Research Practices in Ecology and Evolution». PLOS ONE 13 (7): e0200303. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200303.
Gall, Thomas, John P. A. Ioannidis, y Zacharias Maniadis. 2017. «The Credibility Crisis in Research: Can Economics Tools Help?». PLOS Biology 15 (4): e2001846. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001846.
Gerber, Alan S., y Neil Malhotra. 2008. «Publication Bias in Empirical Sociological Research: Do Arbitrary Significance Levels Distort Published Results?». Sociological Methods & Research 37 (1): 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108318973.
Gerber, Alan, y Neil Malhotra. 2008. «Do Statistical Reporting Standards Affect What Is Published? Publication Bias in Two Leading Political Science Journals». Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3 (3): 313-26. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00008024.
John, Leslie K., George Loewenstein, y Drazen Prelec. 2012. «Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling». Psychological Science 23 (5): 524-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953.
Kerr, Norbert L. 1998. «HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results Are Known». Personality and Social Psychology Review 2 (3): 196-217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4.
Lindsay, D. Stephen. 2020. «Seven Steps toward Transparency and Replicability in Psychological Science.». Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne 61 (4): 310-17. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222.
Makel, Matthew C., Jaret Hodges, Bryan G. Cook, y Jonathan A. Plucker. 2021. «Both Questionable and Open Research Practices Are Prevalent in Education Research». Educational Researcher, marzo, 0013189X211001356. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211001356.
Marsden, Emma, Kara Morgan-Short, Pavel Trofimovich, y Nick C. Ellis. 2018. «Introducing Registered Reports at Language Learning: Promoting Transparency, Replication, and a Synthetic Ethic in the Language Sciences». Language Learning 68 (2): 309-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12284.
Mertens, Gaëtan, y Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos. 2019. «Preregistration of Analyses of Preexisting Data». Psychologica Belgica 59 (1): 338-52. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.493.
Merton, Robert K. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theorerical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Miguel, E., C. Camerer, K. Casey, J. Cohen, K. M. Esterling, A. Gerber, R. Glennerster, et al. 2014. «Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research». Science 343 (6166): 30-31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245317.
Moore, Don A. 2016. «Preregister If You Want To». The American Psychologist 71 (3): 238-39. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040195.
Motyl, Matt, Alexander P. Demos, Timothy S. Carsel, Brittany E. Hanson, Zachary J. Melton, Allison B. Mueller, J. P. Prims, et al. 2017. «The State of Social and Personality Science: Rotten to the Core, Not so Bad, Getting Better, or Getting Worse?». Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 113 (1): 34-58. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000084.
Nosek, Brian A., Charles R. Ebersole, Alexander C. DeHaven, y David T. Mellor. 2018. «The Preregistration Revolution». Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (11): 2600-2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114.
Nosek, Brian A., y Daniël Lakens. 2014. «Registered Reports: A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results». Social Psychology 45 (3): 137-41. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192.
O’Boyle, Ernest Hugh, George Christopher Banks, y Erik Gonzalez-Mulé. 2017. «The Chrysalis Effect: How Ugly Initial Results Metamorphosize Into Beautiful Articles». Journal of Management 43 (2): 376-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527133.
Rabelo, André L. A., Jéssica E. M. Farias, Maurício M. Sarmet, Teresa C. R. Joaquim, Raquel C. Hoersting, Luiz Victorino, João G. N. Modesto, y Ronaldo Pilati. 2020. «Questionable Research Practices among Brazilian Psychological Researchers: Results from a Replication Study and an International Comparison». International Journal of Psychology 55 (4): 674-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12632.
Rosenthal, Robert. 1979. «The File Drawer Problem and Tolerance for Null Results.». Psychological Bulletin 86 (3): 638-41. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638.
Simmons, Joseph P., Leif D. Nelson, y Uri Simonsohn. 2011. «False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant». Psychological Science 22 (11): 1359-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632.
Simonsohn, Uri, Leif D. Nelson, y Joseph P. Simmons. 2014. «P-Curve: A Key to the File-Drawer». Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143 (2): 534-47. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033242.
Steneck, Nicholas H. 2006. «Fostering Integrity in Research: Definitions, Current Knowledge, and Future Directions». Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1): 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022268.
Stewart, Suzanne, Eike Mark Rinke, Ronan McGarrigle, Dermot Lynott, Carole Lunny, Alexandra Lautarescu, Matteo M. Galizzi, Emily K. Farran, y Zander Crook. 2020. «Pre-Registration and Registered Reports: A Primer from UKRN». OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/8v2n7.
Viscusi, W. Kip. 2014. «The Role of Publication Selection Bias in Estimates of the Value of a Statistical Life». Working {{Paper}} 20116. Working Paper Series. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w20116.
Vivalt, Eva. 2015. «Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Impact Evaluation». American Economic Review 105 (5): 467-70. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151015.
Wingen, Tobias, Jana B. Berkessel, y Birte Englich. 2020. «No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology». Social Psychological and Personality Science 11 (4): 454-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412.
Laboratorio de Ciencia Social Abierta (LISA) del Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social (COES)
Para más información puedes contactárnos en nuestro correo